Free Web Hosting | free host | Free Web Space | BlueHost Review

 

Presentation:  The Cult of Saint Andrew

·        Not necessarily clear when and how his cult came here to Scotland.  What I intend to do is to look at the evidence, discuss the ways in which the cult probably came here and then how and when Andrew became the national saint.

The Evidence:

·        The evidence we have are primarily two accounts of the St. Regulus legend.  Both state that Regulus brought the bones to a Pictish king Hungus son of Ferlon, but differ in almost every other detail, despite being produced here within about 10 years of one another (we Think).  Although there may be some truth to some of the details, I think we should concentrate on what they have in common.  As for St Regulus, one of the legends tells of an unnamed saint bringing the relics here, then discussing the king, then going back and naming the saint- so it is thought that Regulus was later added as the likely candidate, since he had been in 4th century Greece and had a very similar name to a local Irish saint - therefore the only reliable evidence is that there was some sort of connection of the cult with this King Hungus.

St. Andrew in England:

·        To understand how the cult reached Scotland we must look toward England.  When St. Augustine came to Britain, he established a second bishop’s see at Rochester which was dedicated to St. Andrew.

·        We see 7/84 churches in 7th & 8th C dedicated to Andrew- This was third after Peter and Mary.

·        In the Mid-7th C there was a conflict in Northumbria between Roman and Columban Churches. Bishop Wilfred, who argued successfully for the Roman Church at Witby, had been to Rome and acquired ‘relics’ (?) there. He also founded monasteries such as Oundle, which was dedicated to St. Andrew, and as bishop he spent most of his time at Hexham, which was also dedicated to St. Andrew.

·        So what we see by the end of the 7th C is that the Roman Church is well established in Northumbria and that St. Andrew is not only well known and popular but also associated with the catholic Roman Church.  There also may have been relics of Andrew in Northumbria. The cult’s presence in England is significant because Northumbria was the main influence on the Pictish church following the expulsion of Iona.

St. Andrew comes to Scotland:

·        It has been suggested that the relics were sent through Russia to Scotland from the Emperor Leo III in the 8th C in order to gain the support of the Celtic church against the papacy, but this seems a bit far fetched to me.

·        The Legends say that his relics were brought here by St. Regulus in 4th C but not only is this highly unlikely but it does not match up with the rule of either Angus, believed to be the king mentioned in the legends.

·        Furthermore, Bede, writing in 731, makes no mention of a cult of St Andrew in Pictland, just St Peter who was encouraged by King Nechtan.  Nechtan brought the Roman practices to Pictland and expelled the Ionan community in 717.  So we can assume the Cult of St. Andrew was either not present or insignificant at this time.

·        Both legends mention a “Hungus son of Ferlon,” generally believed to be Angus son of Fergus.  This gives us good reason to believe that something significant to the cult in Scotland took place during Angus’ reign.  The problem with this is that there were two kings with this name during this period, Angus I and Angus II.

·        It has been argued that Andrew’s relics were brought from Hexham in 732 during the reign of Angus I.  Bishop Acca of Hexham apparently collected the relics of St. Andrew, but was forced to flee, possibly to Fife.  It is thought that he may have brought the relics with him.  This timing fits with Bede, since it was a year after he wrote on the subject.

·        It is also argued that the king in the Legend was Angus II who ruled from 820 to 834.  He is said to have founded “kilrimont” in one legend.  There are, however, several reasons why it may not have been Angus II.  First of all, the note, found in a King List, may date from as late as 1130.  Secondly, there is a reference of an abbot of Cennrigmonaid dying in 746 in the Irish Annals of Tigernach.  Although this has no reference to Andrew being the patron saint of “Kilrimont,” it does suggest that the monastery at that location dates from Angus I at the latest.  Furthermore, Constantine I ruled between the Anguses, and his name may be linked with the Roman Emperor through the connections with the cult of St. Andrew in Greece.

·        One attempt to reconcile these two views states that the original monastery at Kilrimont was founded or existed in the time of Angus I, but was re-founded by Angus II, this time possibly with Andrew as its patron.  Angus II ruled in a time when the cults of major saints were growing in popularity elsewhere and after popes Paul and Paschal I had advocated the transport of saints’ relics to recently converted peoples to strengthen their faith.  So perhaps Kilrimont was founded under Angus I with St. Andrew as its saint but the relics were brought there under Angus II.  We can unfortunately do little more than speculate.

Andrew becomes the National saint:

·        First evidence we have of the importance of Kilrimont is in 906 when Constantine II met with Bishop Cellah to confirm that the church would adhere to the customs of the Scots.  I would argue that the cult was already well established by this date since the Bishop of Kilrimont appears to be the head of the church in Pictland and his successor is called “bishop of the islands of Scotland.”  The primacy of Kilrimont must have derived to a great extent from its veneration of an apostle and the Bishops would have used Andrew, and presumably his relics, to assert control over the other churches. 

·        By the mid tenth century we can be sure that Kilrimont and St Andrew have a national importance since Constantine II retired to “the house of the apostle” at Kilrimont.  A few years later in 965 we find evidence of an Irish prince buried at Kilrimont on pilgrimage and by the time of Malcolm III we see considerable amounts of pilgrims coming to St. Andrews.

In Conclusion:  The cult came to Scotland sometime between 731 and 834.  I think that relics of some sort were likely brought here, probably under Angus II.  And, as in other places, the cult started as popular veneration of Andrew and grew as bishops and kings found it to be to their advantage to associate themselves with this popular devotion.  Thank you.

 

History

Renfroana